Tabloid Culture

tc.jpg

These days, as video clips of celebrities at their worst go viral, disgrace is uglier than ever before. It was bad enough to make old-school scandal-sheet headlines; it's worse to make the excruciatingly undeniable likes of TMZ.com the two-year-old guerrilla Internet gossip website that pushes celebrities off their pedestals with a newfound fury.

TMZ's influence reached a new level in September, when it brought its low standard to TV and positioned it right beside such tamer institutions as "Entertainment Tonight." Airing locally at 6 p.m. on Channel 25 and already a syndicated ratings hit, the 30-minute weeknight "TMZ" has ushered Internet nastiness - and dehumanization - onto the slightly more cautious medium of TV.

The story is that TMZ stands for “thirty mile zone.”

That probably tells you why almost everything on the Web site seems so parochial and limited. The prime gossip site has, for a while now, had its own nightly TV show at 11, opposite all the local newscasts and “The Daily Show.”

The Web site and the show are the brainchildren of Harvey Levin, an attorney by training and TV judicial reporter when he made his bones during the O.J. Simpson trial and almost ruined the whole deal when he ran an erroneous report on a Marcia Clark search. He apologized later.

The site of Levin’s rise still obsesses the fellow. On last Monday’s TMZ show, he showed us a vintage Simpson tape that he seemed to think burned with Simpson trial significance and I thought was a crashing redundancy. It showed O.J. at the House of Blues at a point where he and Nicole Brown Simpson were supposed to be very much apart, but with O.J., on camera, calling Nicole “my woman.” It seems to me, once you’ve read the bloodsoaked pages of “If I Did It” — or even read about it — Levin’s little tape is about as significant as an old grocery list from Mr. Rogers.

Then there’s the whole Britney Spears mess which, I must confess, I’m having more and more difficulty fathoming.

Please don’t get me wrong about this particular reality soap opera. I’d like a nice healthy home environment and lifetime of vehicular safety for those two kids as much as anyone, but I just don’t understand why a mosh pit of paparazzi have to be convened every time she shops for yogurt or tests positive for some substance stronger than cappuccino.

The whole tabloid point of her stumbling, crotch-baring, fender-bending odyssey through fame and wealth seems to be that she’s really a drug-addled floozy and fraud and deserves none of it — especially not custody of two healthy and happy kids.

My problem is that other than a passing interest in her children’s welfare, I couldn’t give a panty raid what she may or may not deserve and I find the whole American obsession increasingly ridiculous.

The freak show symbiosis, though, of the body-baring starlet and spillage-crazed paparazzi has been the essence of the relationship since the first paparazzi started haunting Rome’s Via Veneto more than 50 years ago. (For which see, in dramatic form, the undulations and cavortings of Anita Ekberg in the Trevi Fountain in filmmaker Federico Fellini’s “La Dolce Vita.”)

We have long since gotten used to the idea that there may indeed be a peculiar form of star pathology that needs an accompanying crush of photographers as much as — or more than — one’s own children. Required there, it seems to me, isn’t TMZ nightly but “young Hollywood’s” very own Dr. Phil explaining it all — or trying to.

It is true, though, that TMZ goes the extra mile in its vacuuming of dirt that other people miss. When, last week, the entire world of entertainment info- tattle announced that Spears hadn’t tested positive for any drug that hadn’t already been prescribed by a court-appointed doctor, only TMZ reported that the prescribed medication she is known to use is often used by recovering coke addicts.

And I’ll say one more thing for Levin’s nightly foray into raw snottiness and the deeper irrelevancies of Z-list celebrities on TMZ on TV: It presents all of its smarminess in an original way.

The whole show is offered to us nightly as a kind of editorial meeting in which each individual producer presents his or her daily piece of life inside the thirty mile zone to be offered for our eternal edification, whether it’s what Sharon Stone wore last night or what Lindsay Lohan looked like in her last sighting.

That’s an original way to offer us all this drek — a connection between celeb-rubbish and the smarty-pants who make a living off it. My trouble is that any time they present their stories to Levin at his televised “meeting,” I want to ask “what’s wrong with you people? Why on earth do you care?”

Infotainment mainstays like "ET" and "Access Hollywood" are toughening up to match the competition. At the same time, TV's hunger for juicy drama has made tabloid culture an increasingly popular topic of conversation. Fictional celebrities like Juliet Darling and her "Dirty Sexy Money" family come face to face with cameras out to shame them. On "Gossip Girl" even cellphones are objects of danger; every one is armed with a camera, and the pretty faces of the show's Manhattanites are forever getting instantly uploaded from the streets of the Upper East Side to the Internet.

By all rights, these fictional entertainments should be Hollywood's opportunity to stick it to the TMZ-style paparazzi. Putting tabloid-hounded characters in prime time would be a chance for Hollywood's writers, producers, and actors to crucify the viral media. But as characters such as the Darlings face the flashbulbs, are their lives hell? Nope, not so much.

On the series, as well as on ABC's "Big Shots," NBC's "30 Rock," and ABC's "Ugly Betty," the tabloid wasps are a not-particularly-stinging fact of celebrity life - in some cases, they're even the jesters. (On HBO's "Entourage," a show about being young and beautiful in Hollywood, they simply don't exist.) Most people assume that Hollywood hates the TMZ-style media; but these shows aren't giving the likes of TMZ a very bad PR bump in the road.

Of course, there's little room for chiding or moralizing about the tabloids within the ABC-styled dramedic tone of "Dirty Sexy Money," "Ugly Betty," or "Big Shots." These shows avoid the kind of pointed, uncomfortable satire that made Kirstie Alley's "Fat Actress" such an indictment of tabloid mania. They are well-behaved pieces of entertainment - unwilling to cast a pall over the party. They position the likes of TMZ within the world of celebrity, not outside of it trying to break in and despoil. The tabloids on "Ugly Betty" only serve to affirm the Meades' celebrity in the fashion world. They're not only a necessary evil, but an expedient and profitable evil.

The only current TV series that point fingers at the psychic corrosiveness of the tabloids show up on FX, the network most willing to bite the hand that feeds it as well as the viewers who watch it. Both "Nip/Tuck," now set in Hollywood, and "Dirt," whose heroine is a tabloid editor, have given us young celebrities whose lives are slowly or suddenly torn apart by tabloid venality. They take an openly damning approach, as everyone who comes into contact with the rags - including "Nip/Tuck" plastic surgeon Christian Troy and nearly every character on "Dirt" - is somehow morally sullied or demeaned. "Nip/Tuck" and "Dirt" make their celebrities into insecure creatures who are harmed by crude media attention, not in terms of public image but in terms of self-image.

Perhaps the most revealing take on the tabs belongs to "Gossip Girl," though. The soap takes the polar opposite approach to the FX shows, as it passively accepts tabloid aggressiveness as part of everyday life. Even more than "Dirty Sexy Money," it rolls over on its back rather than fight a kind of good fight against the bottom-feeders. The show's own fictional Internet tabloid - the Gossip Girl website - is operated by a member of the very same clique it trashes. In this youth drama, there is no them-vs.-us distinction between the ruthless Web paparazzi and their rich Upper East Side subjects. The identity of Gossip Girl, the all-seeing snarkster who feeds cruel images of her clique to her website, is unknown. She isn't just embedded and incognito; she's part of the club.